IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned, duly authorized, have signed this Agreement.
DONE in duplicate at , this day of 2009, in the English, French and Czech languages, each version being equally authentic.
FOR CANADA
FOR THE CZECH REPUBLIC
Attachments
Annex A. Clarification of Indirect Expropriation
Article VI (Expropriation) of this Agreement states that:
Investments or returns of investors of either Contracting Party shall not be nationalized, expropriated or subjected to measures having an effect equivalent to nationalization or expropriation (hereinafter referred to as "expropriation") in the territory of the other Contracting Party, except for a public purpose, under due process of law, in a non-discriminatory manner and against prompt, adequate and effective compensation. …
The Contracting Parties confirm their shared understanding that:
(a) The concept of "measures having an effect equivalent to nationalization or expropriation" can also be termed "indirect expropriation." Indirect expropriation results from a measure or series of measures of a Contracting Party that have an effect equivalent to direct expropriation without formal transfer of title or outright seizure;
(b) The determination of whether a measure or series of measures of a Contracting Party constitute an indirect expropriation requires a case-by-case, fact-based inquiry that considers, among other factors:
(i) The economic impact of the measure or series of measures, although the sole fact that a measure or series of measures of a Contracting Party have an adverse effect on the economic value of an investment does not establish that an indirect expropriation has occurred,
(ii) The extent to which the measure or series of measures interfere with distinct, reasonable, investment-backed expectations, and
(iii) The character of the measure or series of measures; and
(c) Except in rare circumstances, such as when a measure or series of measures are so severe in the light of their purpose that they cannot be reasonably viewed as having been adopted and applied in good faith, non-discriminatory measures of a Contracting Party that are designed and applied to protect legitimate public welfare objectives, such as health, safety and the environment, do not constitute indirect expropriation.
Annex B. Settlement of Disputes between an Investor and the Host Contracting Party
I. Public Access to Hearings and Documents
1. Where, after consulting with a disputing investor, a disputing Contracting Party determines that it is in the public interest to do so and notifies the Tribunal of that determination, hearings held under Article X (Settlement of Disputes between an Investor and the Host Contracting Party) shall be open to the public. In that case, to the extent necessary to ensure the protection of confidential information, the Tribunal shall hold portions of the hearings in camera. The Tribunal shall seek to ensure that public access to the proceedings will not result in undue delay to the proceedings.Article X (Settlement of Disputes between an Investor and the Host Contracting Party) shall be open to the public. In that case, to the extent necessary to ensure the protection of confidential information, the Tribunal shall hold portions of the hearings in camera. The Tribunal shall seek to ensure that public access to the proceedings will not result in undue delay to the proceedings.
2. The Tribunal shall establish procedures for the protection of confidential information and appropriate logistical arrangements for open hearings, in consultation with the disputing parties.
3. Any Tribunal award under this Agreement shall be publicly available, subject to the deletion of confidential information. All other documents submitted to, or issued by, the Tribunal shall be publicly available, unless the disputing parties otherwise agree, subject to the deletion of confidential information.
4. A disputing party may disclose to other persons in connection with the arbitral proceedings such unredacted documents as it considers necessary for the preparation of its case, but it shall ensure that those persons protect the confidential information in such documents.
5. The Contracting Parties may share with officials of their respective sub-national governments all relevant unredacted documents in the course of dispute settlement under this Agreement, but they shall ensure that those persons protect any confidential information in such documents.
6. To the extent that a Tribunal's confidentiality order designates information as confidential and a Contracting Party's law on access to information requires public access to that information, the Contracting Party's law on access to information shall prevail. However, a Contracting Party should endeavour to apply its law on access to information so as to protect information designated confidential by the Tribunal.
II. Submissions by Non-Disputing Parties
1. Upon the request of the Tribunal or both disputing parties, the non-disputing Contracting Party may make written submissions to the Tribunal, but only on a question of interpretation of this Agreement. All pleadings submitted to the Tribunal shall be made available to the non-disputing Contracting Party provided that it makes such a submission to the Tribunal. The non-disputing Contracting Party receiving information under this paragraph shall treat the information as if it were a disputing Contracting Party.
2. Any non-disputing party that is a person of a Contracting Party that wishes to file a written submission with the Tribunal (the "applicant") shall apply for leave from the Tribunal to file such a submission, in accordance with the applicable Guidelines set out in Part III of this Annex. The applicant shall attach the submission to the application.Part III of this Annex. The applicant shall attach the submission to the application.
3. The applicant shall serve the application for leave to file a non-disputing party submission and the submission on all disputing parties and the Tribunal.
4. The Tribunal shall set an appropriate date for the disputing parties to comment on the application for leave to file a non-disputing party submission.
5. In determining whether to grant leave to file a non-disputing party submission, the Tribunal shall consider, among other things, the extent to which:
(a) The non-disputing party submission would assist the Tribunal in the determination of a factual or legal issue related to the arbitration by bringing a perspective, particular knowledge or insight that is substantially different from that of the disputing parties and up to then had not been known by the Tribunal;
(b) The non-disputing party submission would address a matter within the scope of the dispute;
(c) The non-disputing party has a significant interest in the arbitration; and
(d) There is a public interest in the subject-matter of the arbitration.
6. The Tribunal shall ensure that:
(a) Any non-disputing party submission avoids disrupting the proceedings; and
(b) Neither disputing party is unduly burdened or unfairly prejudiced by such submissions.
7. The Tribunal shall decide whether to grant leave to file a non-disputing party submission. If leave to file a non-disputing party submission is granted, the Tribunal shall set an appropriate date for the disputing parties to respond in writing to the non-disputing party submission. By that date, the non-disputing Contracting Party may, pursuant to the provisions in paragraph 1, address any issues of interpretation of this Agreement presented in the non-disputing party submission.
8. A Tribunal that grants leave to file a non-disputing party submission is not required to address the submission at any point in the arbitration, nor is the non-disputing party that files the submission entitled to make further submissions in the arbitration.
9. Access to hearings and documents by non-disputing parties that file applications under these procedures shall be governed by the provisions of Part I of this Annex (Public Access to Hearings and Documents).Part I of this Annex (Public Access to Hearings and Documents).
III. Guidelines for Submissions by a Non-Disputing Party
1. The application for leave to file a non-disputing party submission shall:
(a) Be made in writing, dated and signed by the person filing the application, and include the address and other contact details of the applicant;
(b) Be no longer than five typed pages;
(c) Describe the applicant, including, where relevant, its membership and legal status (e.g., company, trade association or other non-governmental organization), its general objectives, the nature of its activities, and any parent organization (including any organization that directly or indirectly controls the applicant);
(d) Disclose whether or not the applicant has any affiliation, direct or indirect, with any disputing party;
(e) Identify any government, person or organization that has provided any financial or other assistance in preparing the submission;
(f) Specify the nature of the interest that the applicant has in the arbitration;
(g) Identify the specific issues of fact or law in the arbitration that the applicant has addressed in its written submission;
(h) Explain, by reference to the factors specified in paragraph 5 of Part II of this Annex (Submissions by Non-Disputing Parties), why the Tribunal should accept the submission; andparagraph 5 of Part II of this Annex (Submissions by Non-Disputing Parties), why the Tribunal should accept the submission; and
(i) Be made in a language of the arbitration.
2. The submission filed by a non-disputing party shall:
(a) Be dated and signed by the person filing the submission;
(b) Be concise, and in no case longer than 20 typed pages, including any appendices;
(c) Set out a precise statement supporting the applicant's position on the issues; and
(d) Only address matters within the scope of the dispute.