CONSUMER UNITY TRUST SOCIETY_1998
Previous page Next page

Government or the ownership or control of assets of Government-owned enterprises or Government

controlled enterprises-

(a) from a Government in a Contracting State or from a corporation, authority or entity owned

or controlled by the Government in a Contracting State;

(b) to an investor or investment not owned or controlled by a Contracting Party or by

Government or by a corporation, authority or entity owned or controlled by Government in

the Contracting Party.

A. MONOPOLIES

1. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to prevent a Contracting Party from

maintaining, designating or eliminating a monopoly.

2. Each Contracting Party shall endeavour to accord non-discriminatory treatment when

designating a monopoly.

3. Each Contracting Party shall ensure that any monopoly that its national or sub-national

governments maintains or designates or any privately-owned monopoly that it designates

and any government monopoly that it maintains or designates:

(a) acts in a manner that is not inconsistent with the Contracting Party's obligations

under this Agreement wherever such a monopoly exercises any regulatory,

administrative or other governmental authority that the Contracting Party has

delegated to it in connection with the purchase or sale of the monopoly good or

service or any other matter.

(b) provides non-discriminatory treatment to investors of another Contracting Party and

their investments in its sale of the monopoly good or service in the relevant market;

(c) provides non-discriminatory treatment to investors of another Contracting Party and

their investments in its purchase of the monopoly good or service in the relevant

market. This paragraph does not apply to procurement by governmental agencies of

goods or services for government purposes and not with a view to commercial resale

or with a view to use in the production of goods or services for commercial sale;

(d) does not use its monopoly position, in a non-monopolised market in its territory, to

engage, either directly or indirectly, including through its dealing with its parent

company, its subsidiary or other enterprise with common ownership, in

anti-competitive practices that might adversely affect an investment by an investor of

another Contracting Party, including through the discriminatory provision of the

monopoly good or service, cross-subsidisation or predatory conduct.

(e) except to comply with any terms of its designation that are not inconsistent with

subparagraph (b), (c) or (d), acts solely in accordance with commercial

considerations in its purchase or sale of the monopoly good or service in the relevant

market, including with regard to price, quality, availability, marketability,

transportation and other terms and conditions of purchase or sale.

Nothing in Article A shall be construed to prevent a monopoly from charging different prices in

different geographic markets, where such differences are based on normal commercial

considerations, such as taking account of supply and demand conditions in those markets.

4. In case of a demonopolisation which has the effect of extending the obligations under the

Agreement to a new area, the principle of standstill does not intend to prevent any

Contracting Party from lodging any reservation to the Agreement for this new area.

5. Each Contracting Party shall notify to the Parties group any existing monopoly within (60)

days after the entry into force of the Agreement and any newly created monopoly within (6)

days after its creation.

6. Neither investors of another Contracting Party nor their investments may have recourse to

investor-state arbitration for any matter arising out of paragraph 3(b), (c), (d) or (e) of this

Article.

B. STATE ENTERPRISES

1. Each Contracting Party shall ensure that any state enterprise that it maintains or establishes

acts in a manner that is not inconsistent with the Contracting Party's obligations under this

Agreement wherever such enterprise exercises any regulatory, administrative or other

governmental authority that the Contracting Party has delegated to it.

2. Each Contracting party shall ensure that any state enterprise that it maintains or establishes

accords non-discriminatory treatment in the sale, in the Contracting Party's territory, of its

goods or services to investors of another Contracting Party and their investment.

3. Neither investors of another Contracting Party nor their investments may have recourse to

investor-state arbitration for any matter arising out of paragraph 2 of this Article.

C. DEFINITIONS RELATED TO MONOPOLIES AND STATE ENTERPRISES

1. "Delegation" means a legislative grant, and a government order directive or other act

transferring to the monopoly or state enterprise, or authorising the exercise by the monopoly

or state enterprise of, governmental authority.

2. "Designate" means to establish, designate or authorise, or to expand the scope of a

monopoly to cover an additional good or service, after the date of entry into force of this

agreement.

3. "Monopoly" means an entity, including a consortium or government agency, that in any

relevant market in the territory of a Contracting Party is designated as the sole provider or

purchaser of a good or service, but does not include an entity that has been granted an

exclusive intellectual property right solely by reason of such grant or "Monopoly" means

any person, public and private, designated by a national or local government authority as the

sole supplier or buyer of a good or service in a given market in the territory of a Contracting

Party.

4. "Relevant market" means the geographical and commercial market for a good or service.

5. "Non-discriminatory treatment" means the better of national treatment and most favoured

nation treatment, as set out in the relevant provisions of this Agreement.

6. "State enterprises" means, an enterprise owned, or controlled through ownership interest, by

a Contracting Party.

C--EXCEPTIONS FOR CERTAIN STATES

The provisions contained under "A." Monopolies" and "B. State Enterprises" above, shall not bind

Contracting Parties, where their statutory provisions conflict with aforesaid provisions.

Article 7. CORPORATE ENTERPRISES: SENIOR MANAGERS

No Contracting Party may require that an enterprise in the territory of that Party, which is an

investment of an investor of another Contracting Party, shall appoint, to senior managerial positions

in that enterprise, individuals of any particular nationality. An exception to this obligation shall,

however, be permissible where such a requirement, is considered necessary, having regard to the

following considerations:

(a) the technical or financial or other participation in the enterprise, contributed by the

Contracting Party, or by any Corporation, authority or agency owned or controlled by the

Government in the Contracting State; or

(b) some compelling, economic or political interest of the Contracting Party.

Article 8. APPLICABLE LAW

1. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, all investments shall be governed by the

laws in force in the territory of the Contracting Party in which such investments are made.

2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1 of this Article, nothing in this Agreement precludes the host

Contracting Party from taking action for the protection of its essential security interests or in

circumstances of extreme emergency in accordance with its laws normally and reasonably

applied on a non-discriminatory basis.

Article 9. INVESTMENT PROTECTION: GENERAL TREATMENT

1.1. (a) Each Contracting Party shall accord, to investments (in its territory) of investors of

another Contracting State, fair and equitable treatment and full and constant protection and security,

including such treatment, protection and security in respect of the operation, management,

maintenance, use, enjoyment or disposal of such investment.

(b) In no such case shall a Contracting Party accord, to such investments, treatment or

protection that is less favourable than that required by customary international law.

EXPROPRIATION AND COMPENSATION

2.1 A Contracting Party shall not expropriate or nationalise directly or indirectly an investment in

its territory of an investor of another Contracting Party or take any measure or measures having

equivalent effect (hereinafter referred to as "expropriation"") except :

(a) for a purpose which is in the public interest;

(b) on a non-discriminatory basis;

(c) in accordance with due process of law; and

(d) accompanied by payment of prompt, adequate and effective compensation in

accordance with Articles 2.2 to 2.5 below.

2.2 Compensation shall be paid without delay.

2.3 Compensation shall be equivalent to the fair market value of the expropriated investment

immediately before the expropriation occurred. The fair market value shall not reflect any change in

value occurring because the expropriation had become publicly known earlier.

2.4 Compensation shall be fully realisable and freely transferable.

2.5 Compensation shall include interest at a commercial rate established on a market basis for the

currency of payment from the date of expropriation until the date of actual payment.

2.6 Due process of law includes, in particular, the right of an investor of a Contracting Party which

claims to be affected by expropriation by another Contracting Party to prompt review of its case,

including the valuation of its investment and the payment of compensation in accordance with the

provisions of this article, by a judicial authority or another competent and independent authority of

the latter Contracting Party.

2.7 For the purpose of deciding whether expropriation by a Contracting Party is for a purpose which

is in the public interest within the meaning of clause (a) of Article 2, it shall be permissible to use

the following as persuasive (though not binding) material, namely:

(a) statutory precedents in the Contracting Party (in whose territory the investment is

situated), providing for expropriation of any property, undertaking or assets;

(b) judicial decisions relevant to the concept of public purpose or analogical concepts in

the context of expropriation of any property, undertaking or assets."

3. PROTECTION FROM STRIFE

3.1 An investor of a Contracting Party which has suffered losses relating to its investment in the

territory of an another Contracting Party due to war or other armed conflict, state of emergency,

revolution, insurrection, civil disturbance, or any other similar event in the territory of the latter

Contracting Party, shall be accorded by the latter Contracting Party, as regards restitution,

indemnification, compensation or any other settlement, treatment no less favourable than that which

it accords to its own investors or to investors of any third State, whichever is most favourable to the

investor.

3.2 Notwithstanding Article 3.1, an investor of a Contracting Party which, in any of the situations

referred to in that paragraph, suffers a loss in the territory of another Contracting Party resulting

from:

(a) requisitioning of its investment or part thereof by the latter's forces or authorities, or

(b) destruction of its investment or part thereof by the latter's forces or authorities, which was

not required by the necessity of the situation, shall be accorded by the latter Contracting

Party restitution or compensation which in either case shall be prompt, adequate and

effective and, with respect to compensation, shall be in accordance with Articles 2.1 to 2.5.